That in itself is a tall order. But consider that in addition to this, the coronavirus pandemic forced them to face an onslaught of emergency cases far beyond an imaginable forecast. And although they quickly rose to the occasion, it’s important to note the other expectations they are asked to meet including:
Now consider how much of a challenge that is for small hospitals – many of which are closing or have limited resources to fully serve the communities they treat.
A podcast from the Wharton School recently addressed the closure of Philadelphia’s Hahnemann University Hospital and the spreading extinction of rural hospitals. According to a Chartis Center for Rural Health study, 120 have shuttered since 2010. The podcast noted that many big-city hospitals have consolidated to absorb financial losses and mitigate their operational costs, which has had a negative impact on small hospitals.
Drexel University’s Robert Field, a law and health management professor, and Wharton lecturer observed that major hospital systems are not only growing in size but growing more sophisticated. “They’re adding high-tech procedures and equipment. They’re now onto gene therapy and these futuristic kinds of treatments,” he said. “But the lower-tier hospitals, which is what Hahnemann has been, or even the mid-tier hospitals have not been able to survive on their own. We’re seeing everything drawn to the major centers, which is a particular problem in rural areas, where those centers might be 50 miles away.”
The closure of a small hospital will have inevitable consequences for its surrounding towns. In addition to ending the employment of hundreds of local residents, from nurses to cafeteria staff, the closure will force patients to travel further for basic care. This can have a dire impact in medical emergencies, especially for patients having a stroke or heart attack in a town two hours from the nearest hospital.
Many small hospitals have fought to stay open and continue providing services to their communities. Yet many still face financial struggles and provider burnout, which can also impact patient care.
One solution: virtual care. Not only can virtual care delivery help small hospitals compete and survive, but they can also use virtual platforms to:
Retaining advanced medical care in rural communities and small towns is vital. The National Rural Health Association reports there are only 30 specialists per 100,000 people in rural communities, compared to 263 specialists per 100,000 urban residents, yet the rates for the five leading causes of death in the U.S. – heart disease, cancer, unintentional injury, chronic lower respiratory disease, and stroke—are higher in rural communities. Without the preventive screenings and ongoing care facilitated by a local hospital, these patients can face dire consequences. Telemedicine can restore a culture of care even in remote communities and help their populations live healthier lives.